Skip to content
MementropyKnowledge
AcademyKnowledge base

Coverage v2 — Adding MLA-C01

Extends the Claude coverage to a three-cert program by folding in AWS MLA-C01 (ML Associate).

HungerSync Case Series — Adding MLA-C01 (Coverage v2)

Section titled “HungerSync Case Series — Adding MLA-C01 (Coverage v2)”

Extends coverage-matrix.md and case-map.md to a three-certification program. Verdict: not a pivot — additive. MLA-C01 adopts the one HungerSync subsystem the GenAI certs structurally exclude (the predictive ML / prediction engine), giving the world a clean three-layer stratification.


  • Claude Architect excludes training, fine-tuning, embeddings.
  • AIP-C01 out-of-scope explicitly names “Model development and training” and “Data engineering and feature engineering.”
  • MLA-C01 is exactly those: data prep, feature engineering, training, tuning, evaluation, deployment, drift, retraining.

The HungerSync prediction engine (delay / demand / taste / pre-positioning models) was always in the business architecture but had no cert home. MLA-C01 is that home.

Layer Cert HungerSync surface
Prediction (upstream ML/MLOps) MLA-C01 delay/demand/taste models: data→features→train→tune→eval→deploy→drift→retrain
Application (GenAI on AWS) AIP-C01 RAG, FM integration, safety, ops, deployment of the GenAI app
Agent (reasoning/orchestration) Claude Architect agentic loops, MCP, Claude Code, multi-agent dispatch

The prediction layer feeds the agent layer. Upstream → downstream.

3. MLA-C01 at a glance (pass 720/1000; 50 scored Qs; MC + multi-response + ordering + matching)

Section titled “3. MLA-C01 at a glance (pass 720/1000; 50 scored Qs; MC + multi-response + ordering + matching)”
Domain Weight
D1 Data Preparation for ML 28%
D2 ML Model Development 26%
D3 Deployment & Orchestration of ML Workflows 22%
D4 ML Solution Monitoring, Maintenance & Security 24%

Net-new (needs the predictive-ML lifecycle — these are the distinct MLA surface): D1 entirely (1.1 ingest/store, 1.2 transform/feature-eng, 1.3 integrity/bias) · D2 entirely (2.1 modeling approach, 2.2 train/tune/fine-tune, 2.3 evaluate) · D3.1 (ML endpoints, batch inference) · D3.3 retraining loop · D4.1 model drift.

Shared (absorb via tags on existing cases — do NOT duplicate): D3.2 (IaC/containers/autoscale) → CS1, CS6 · D3.3 generic CI/CD → CS7 · D4.2 (infra/cost monitoring) → CS9 · D4.3 (IAM/VPC/security) → CS8 · D1.3 PII/residency → CS8.


Case Title Layer MLA tasks Notes
ML1 Will this flight be late? Prediction 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1 Data foundation + feature engineering + model choice. Home for PiAware/weather edge ingestion (Kinesis/Kafka/Flink) + Feature Store. Resolves edge watch-item W4.
ML2 Training, tuning, and trusting the model Prediction 2.2, 2.3 Hyperparameter tuning (AMT), ensembling, fine-tuning the taste classifier (resolves W1), F1/AUC/RMSE, Clarify bias, shadow vs prod.
ML3 Shipping and watching the model Prediction 3.1, 3.3, 4.1 SageMaker endpoints + batch inference for the nightly forecast (ties to CS9) + SageMaker Pipelines retraining loop + Model Monitor drift.

Three net-new cases cover an entire 4-domain cert because the rest is shared. That is as tight as a new layer can be.


6. Integrated lineup (12 cases + capstone) with tri-cert tags

Section titled “6. Integrated lineup (12 cases + capstone) with tri-cert tags”

C = Claude Architect · A = AIP-C01 · M = MLA-C01

# Title Primary Also tagged
ML1 Will this flight be late? M
ML2 Training, tuning, trusting the model M
ML3 Shipping & watching the model M A (batch/deploy overlap)
CS1 Designing HungerSync A M (IaC), C (arch judgment)
CS2 The ordering agent you can trust C A
CS3 The storm breaks the pipeline C+A
CS4 Discovery you can trust A C
CS5 The four-hour delay conversation C A
CS6 Claude Code: config & workflows C M (IaC)
CS7 Claude in the pipeline: review & CI C A, M (CI/CD)
CS8 Trust & Safety: guardrails, privacy, governance A M (IAM/VPC/PII)
CS9 The ops center A+C M (infra/cost/drift)
CS10 Capstone: end-to-end ground stop all three spans every layer

Layer balance: Prediction (M) = ML1–ML3; Application (A) = CS1/CS4/CS8/CS9; Agent (C) = CS2/CS5/CS6/CS7; spine joints = CS3/CS9; capstone = CS10.


7. MLA-C01 task → case coverage (all 12)

Section titled “7. MLA-C01 task → case coverage (all 12)”
MLA task Covered by
1.1 Ingest & store data ML1
1.2 Transform & feature engineering ML1
1.3 Data integrity, bias, PII/residency ML1 (bias/integrity), CS8 (PII/residency)
2.1 Choose modeling approach ML1
2.2 Train & refine (tune, ensemble, fine-tune) ML2
2.3 Analyze model performance ML2
3.1 Select deployment infra (endpoints, batch) ML3, CS9
3.2 Create/script infra (IaC, containers, autoscale) CS1, CS6
3.3 CI/CD orchestration + retraining ML3 (retraining), CS7 (CI/CD)
4.1 Monitor model inference (drift) ML3
4.2 Monitor & optimize infra & cost CS9
4.3 Secure AWS resources (IAM/VPC) CS8

All 12 covered. (Claude 30/30 and AIP 20/20 remain covered — unchanged.)


  • W1 (fine-tuning had no clean home) → ML2 (MLA 2.2 fine-tune pre-trained models).
  • W4 (edge/IoT had no exam home) → ML1 (MLA 1.1 streaming ingestion + Feature Store).

Remaining: CS10 capstone confirmation; novel ordering (later).


  1. Tighter still? ML1+ML2 could merge into one “build the delay model” case if you want 11 total instead of 12. (Lean: keep separate — data/modeling vs training/eval are distinct skill clusters and MLA weights D1+D2 at 54%.)
  2. Confirm CS10 as the tri-layer capstone.
  3. Build order unchanged: template → CS1 (reference) → outward; ML1 is the natural first case of the prediction track.